Re: tojc
normanbj@PLU.edu
Thu, 12 Sep 1996 19:47:27 -0800 (PST)
I believe the answer book erred on problem 1.17 g because in order for
there to be another carbon sprouting off the chain, there would have to
be 7 total carbons instead of 6, like in the original formula in the problem.
On Thu, 12 Sep 1996 stoneag@PLU.edu wrote:
> could someone please explain the bondline formula for problem 1.17 g. The
> answer has a branch off the forth carbon instead of a chain of 6 carbons
> long.
> thanks,
> allister
>